Re: [patch] memory commands

[Hollis Blanchard]

On Jan 2, 2006, at 11:53 AM, Marco Gerards wrote:

> How about trap?  I didn't understand that part.  In that case you
> write the trap instruction to that address?  Shouldn't you flush the
> instruction cache in that case?

Yes, and I do.

> Have you considered adding a feature so instead of an address a symbol
> name can be used? :-)

So far I haven't wanted a feature like that, but in the future it could 
be added.

-Hollis