[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: disk vs partition numbering
From: |
Tristan Gingold |
Subject: |
Re: disk vs partition numbering |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Dec 2006 06:01:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:09:59AM +0100, adrian15 wrote:
> >On Wednesday 13 December 2006 09:59, adrian15 wrote:
> >>> For them their first hard disk (Who is going to have a zero-hard disk in
> >>> the real world. It has no sense) is C:, but you could name it 1.
> >>> And when they partition their hard disk they suppose that the first cut
> >>> it is the 1 not the 0.
> >
> >And you could name it 0.
>
> This is in computing world... but if you go to a building you go to the
> ground floor or to the 1st floor but you not do go to the 0th floor!
That's a pretty interesting example. In US and Japan ground floor is 1st floor
while in *some* other countries (such as France) ground floor is 0th floor.
I concluded that some conventions are not universal and one have to choose
one.
Tristan.