Re: binutils version?

[Gregg Levine]

On 3/15/07, James Hartley <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 3/15/07, Gregg C Levine <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Do you see any problems regarding the LZO version, and more importantly as
> > to where it was placed? Or just with the binary utilities?
>
> I have run into the "LZO library version 1.02 or later is required" message,
> however, I also found the following link which states that playing with the
> flags sent to the linker can be used as a workaround:
>
> http://www.arcknowledge.com/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.grub.devel/2006-04/msg00074.html
>
> Are you saying that the LZO issue is the only problem to be worked around, &
> that having binutils 2.17 is sufficient?
>
> Thanks for any clarification you can provide.
>
> Jim
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
Hello!
Yes, as a matter of fact. The LZO issue is one that's been surrounding
us for the entire period that we've been running this project.

--
Gregg C Levine address@hidden
"This signature was once found posting rude
messages in English in the Moscow subway."