[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: i386-pc 'chainloader' is something wrong. (RE: I write a patch forJa
Yoshinori K. Okuji
Re: i386-pc 'chainloader' is something wrong. (RE: I write a patch forJapanese NEC i386 old computers.)
Sat, 7 Apr 2007 15:13:19 +0200
On Saturday 31 March 2007 06:24, Hitoshi Ozeki wrote:
> > Please see 'grub-1.96/loader/i386/pc/chainloader.c' and
> > 'grub-1.96/kern/loader.c'
> > When we execute the 'boot' command, process the 'grub_loader_boot()'
> (omit it)
> To sum up, On 'chainloader' of i386-pc,
> However 'grub_loader_boot()' executes 'grub_device_open()', it will fail
> But 'grub_loader_boot()' do it.
> If this behavior is wrong, we do only fix it.
You are right. This is wrong. I will have a look later.
> What I wish to know is which is the boot drive.
> 1. 'root' environment indicates it.
> 2. argument of 'chainloader' command indicates it.
> For example:
> grub> set root=hd0,1
> grub> chainloader (hd0,2)0+2
> grub> boot
> If the 1st is, boot from (hd0,1) and bootloader is (hd0,2)0+2.
> If the 2nd is, boot from (hd0,2) and bootloader is (hd0,2)0+2.
> ...Aha! EFI looks to choose 1st. Should I obey it?
Yes. This is the intented behavior. The distinction is important, because you
might want to save a boot sector at somewhere else, and chainload it later.
This feature makes recovery much easier.
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- Re: i386-pc 'chainloader' is something wrong. (RE: I write a patch forJapanese NEC i386 old computers.),
Yoshinori K. Okuji <=