[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader |
Date: |
Wed, 30 May 2007 15:11:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 11:06:49AM +0200, Patrick Georgi wrote:
>
> As so often, it can be used for, and against the user.
Do these chips support so-called "owner override" ? If they don't, then
this tool contains logic specificaly designed to be used _against_ the user,
and your argument that "it can be used for good or bad" doesn't hold: It is
not like a hammer, it's like a gun.
--
Robert Millan
My spam trap is address@hidden Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, (continued)
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, Julien Ranc, 2007/05/24
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, Robert Millan, 2007/05/24
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, Patrick Georgi, 2007/05/25
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, Bruno Wolff III, 2007/05/25
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, Robert Millan, 2007/05/30
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, Stefan Reinauer, 2007/05/30
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, Marco Gerards, 2007/05/31
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, Stefan Reinauer, 2007/05/31
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, Patrick Georgi, 2007/05/31
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, Robert Millan, 2007/05/31
- Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader,
Robert Millan <=
Re: TPM chip and Grub bootloader, Jerone Young, 2007/05/26