[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] split realmode and loader routines out of startup.S
From: |
Jeroen Dekkers |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] split realmode and loader routines out of startup.S |
Date: |
Fri, 04 Jan 2008 18:15:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:09:07 +0200,
Robert Millan wrote:
> This patch splits realmode and loader routines out of startup.S. The idea
> is that the LinuxBIOS port can be adapted to share more code with the rest
> of GRUB instead of duplicating it.
>
> This is quite critical stuff, so even if the change seems trivial I'd suggest
> being careful, since I don't trust myself too much. Of course, I've tested
> that it can still boot Linux and Multiboot (on qemu only). Perhaps testing
> on real hardware would be appropiate (but I don't have this handy atm).
<SNIP>
> * kern/i386/pc/startup.S (protstack): Moved to ...
> * kern/i386/realmode.S (protstack): ... here.
> * kern/i386/pc/startup.S (gdt): Moved to ...
> * kern/i386/realmode.S (gdt): ... here.
> * kern/i386/pc/startup.S (prot_to_real): Moved to ...
> * kern/i386/realmode.S (prot_to_real): ... here.
>
> * kern/i386/pc/startup.S: Include `kern/i386/loader.S' and
> `kern/i386/realmode.S'.
Why did you move prot_to_real to realmode.S, but not real_to_prot?
That seems a bit strange to me...
Jeroen Dekkers
- Re: [PATCH] split realmode and loader routines out of startup.S,
Jeroen Dekkers <=