[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IA64 port
From: |
Robert Millan |
Subject: |
Re: IA64 port |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:08:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:31:21AM +0100, address@hidden wrote:
> > util/i386/efi/grub-mkimage.c already generates PE, right? Why a different
> > way to handle this? Sound like it'd be more consistent to either use elf2pe
> > on both or share the same grub-mkimage. What do you think?
>
> Having only one implementation is for sure a goal. But there are many
> differences between the two implementations:
>
> * grub-mkimage can only handle PE and I386.
> * grub-mkimage can put modules image in a section.
> * elf2pe can generate PE and PE+ and read I386 or IA64 ELF.
>
> Enhancing grub-mkimage is not a small work as there are a lot of 32 bits
> types.
> And in any case we have to test the two implementations (doable).
>
> In my opinion, there is no need to hurry here. The both implementations work,
> they do slightly different job, do not require maintainance and we can do
> the merge later.
No objection from me.
--
Robert Millan
<GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call!
<DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
- IA64 port, Tristan Gingold, 2008/01/28
- Re: IA64 port, Robert Millan, 2008/01/28
- Re: IA64 port, Robert Millan, 2008/01/29
- Re: IA64 port, tgingold, 2008/01/29
- Re: IA64 port, Robert Millan, 2008/01/29
- Re: IA64 port, tgingold, 2008/01/29
- Re: IA64 port, Robert Millan, 2008/01/29
- Re: IA64 port, Marco Gerards, 2008/01/29
- Re: IA64 port, Robert Millan, 2008/01/29
- Re: IA64 port, tgingold, 2008/01/29
- Re: IA64 port, Robert Millan, 2008/01/29
- Re: IA64 port, Tristan Gingold, 2008/01/30