[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation.

From: Robert Millan
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7]: Fix sparc64 setjmp implementation.
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 11:39:23 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 04:34:47PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > 
> > I think we're already using longs this way in quite a few places.  It's not
> > such a big deal IMHO.
> And ironically enough, using "unsigned long" would allow us to
> share this header with any future 32-bit sparc GRUB support.

Are there any GNU/Linux distributions still supporting 32-bit sparc?

Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]