Re: [PATCH] Use hfs case ordering - another try

[Robert Millan]

On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:37:14PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> It's a shame the discussion about hfs got nowhere.  I've made another
> patch.  I didn't look at the Linux hfs sources or at any previous
> patches.  I took the case ordering table from hfsutils 3.2.6, which is
> licensed under GPL v2 or newer.  Then I ran the table through a simple
> program to make it more readable (attached for reference).  The values
> in the table have been normalized to avoid gaps.  Values for equal
> characters are initialized on the same line for readability.
> 
> ChangeLog:
> 
>       * fs/hfs.c (grub_hfs_strncasecmp): New function.
>       (grub_hfs_cmp_catkeys): Use HFS specific string comparison.

Seems good to me.  Thanks Pavel.

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."