Re: Grub-devel Digest, Vol 65, Issue 108

[Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko]

On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Battail
Yannick<address@hidden> wrote:
>> Am Donnerstag, den 30.07.2009, 11:45 -0400 schrieb Pavel Roskin:
>>> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 15:05 +0200, adrian15 wrote:
>>> > Felix Zielcke escribiĂł:
>>> > > I think the currently under development part can be now removed.
>>> > > Or would it be better to wait for the 1.97 release? (which hopefully
>>> > > comes before December)
>>> > That would be nice because Debian freezes at December.
>>>
>>> I don't see anything wrong with being "under development".  I hope that
>>> GRUB 2 will be under development even after the 1.97.  I don't see how
>>> Debian can have any problem with that.
>>>
>>
>> Well to me it just sounds that isn't at all usable for an average user
>> and not that it's actively developed.
>> IIRC Colin Watson from the debian-installer team even told me this when
>> I asked first about changing the grub2 instead of grub-legacy template
>> in grub-installer. That says still that grub2 is experimental software.
>> But okay if we want to keep it and d-i team refuses to change that just
>> because of that part in the grub2 website, then I just accept that.
>>
>
> We should say that version 1.97 is stable and version 1.98 is in development.
This is to be decided by maintainer
>
> Why GRUB two is in version one dot ninety seven not version two dot ... ?
>
Because 2.0 is our first goal and now we're at (2.0 - 0.035)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel
>



-- 
Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko

Personal git repository: http://repo.or.cz/w/grub2/phcoder.git