|
From: | Bruce Dubbs |
Subject: | Re: How to install grub on fakeraid (raid 0) which spans 2 TB? |
Date: | Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:57:45 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.16) Gecko/20080722 SeaMonkey/1.1.11 |
André Heynatz wrote:
André Heynatz wrote:I have bought two 1 TB harddisks and one 2 TB harddisk (backup). I want to use the 1 TB harddisks in a RAID 0 array (Intel ICH8R
P ntfs 300 GB Windows XP SP3 32 Bit P ntfs 300 GB Windows 7 32 Bit E L swap 2 GB Linux swap L ext4 250 GB Ubuntu Linux 9.10 (Karmic) 32 Bit L ntfs 1100 GB data (for data exchange and storage) L ext4 48 GB spare space for testing of new OSesI'd suggest: P ext2 100 MB /boot P ntfs 300 GB Windows XP SP3 32 Bit P ntfs 300 GB Windows 7 32 Bit E L swap 2 GB Linux swap L ext4 250 GB Ubuntu Linux 9.10 (Karmic) 32 Bit L ntfs 1100 GB data (for data exchange and storage) L ext4 48 GB spare space for testing of new OSes There is no need for /boot to be on a raid or other 'special' partition type. -- BruceHello Bruce, thanks for the suggestion. But in order to do this I would need to remove the perfectly working Windows XP and Windows 7 systems to dothis which would be a pity.
No, not really. From your post I thought you you were working with a blank HD. Try this:
P ntfs 300 GB Windows XP SP3 32 Bit P ntfs 300 GB Windows 7 32 Bit P ext2 100 MB /boot E L swap 2 GB Linux swap L ext4 250 GB Ubuntu Linux 9.10 (Karmic) 32 Bit L ntfs 1100 GB data (for data exchange and storage) L ext4 48 GB spare space for testing of new OSesI like to use the first partition as /boot, but there is no requirement to do that. I think you can use a logical partition too, but I'm not 100% sure.
GRUB normally uses a BIOS call as a part of its internal process. The extended call is defined for up to 2^48 sectors. That is far larger than any disk available today. Any limitation, if it exists, is in the BIOS.
I feel that Linux just CAN do it with Fakeraid, only a tiny bit of work is needed for support. I managed to install Linux on Fakeraid three years ago, with a complicated procedure. It worked like a charm, until I needed more capacity. This time it is a little bit more difficult to get to a solution. I do not care if it is GRUB1 or GRUB2, it should work with both because we are at a turning point and cannot neglect the fact that we need a transition period. I assume that GRUB is to serve users well ofcourse.
That's your choice of course. I haven't worked with any SW raid. I've always thought that HW raid was a better choice. After all, the value of your data is far greater than any raid device.
-- Bruce
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |