[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

guile/guile-core BUGS

From: Thien-Thi Nguyen
Subject: guile/guile-core BUGS
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 13:13:53 -0400

CVSROOT:        /cvs
Module name:    guile
Branch:         branch_release-1-6
Changes by:     Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden>       01/10/25 13:13:53

Modified files:
        guile-core     : BUGS 

Log message:
        (4): New.


Index: guile/guile-core/BUGS
diff -u guile/guile-core/BUGS:1.2 guile/guile-core/BUGS:1.3
--- guile/guile-core/BUGS:1.2   Thu Oct 25 12:38:46 2001
+++ guile/guile-core/BUGS       Thu Oct 25 13:11:13 2001
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
 3   fixed: DATE (for guile VERSION)       ^fixed: (.+) .for guile (.+).$
-DATE is formatted YYY-MM-DD, or "not-yet".  Line numbering is zero-origin;
+DATE is formatted YYYY-MM-DD, or "not-yet".  Line numbering is zero-origin;
 line 0 is empty (newline always follows newpage (recognizable w/ "\f\n")).
 The suggested regexps can be used in a line-oriented parser.
@@ -59,6 +59,27 @@
 improvement in its considerations.  then, hopefully it becomes light.
 to change people is difficult, but that's why we have guile...
+bug 4 -- named-let transform evaluates initvalue in the wrong scope
+reported-by: address@hidden / 2001-09-21
+fixed: not-yet
+> (let name ((var init) ...) body ...)
+> to
+> (letrec ((name (lambda (var ...) body ...)))
+>   (name init ...))
+should be:
+> ((letrec ((name (lambda (var ...) body ...))) name) init ...)
+Dirk Herrmann sez:
+I will do it - no big deal (I hope).  But, I won't have time to do it
+before next week.  What about adding this code as a test case to the test
+suite?  Until it is fixed, it can be tagged as expected to fail.
 [BUGS ends here]

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]