[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scm_sloppy_memq
From: |
Dirk Herrmann |
Subject: |
Re: scm_sloppy_memq |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Dec 2000 17:46:16 +0100 (MET) |
On 1 Dec 2000, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
> Yes, only these are needed: 1. scm_memq and 2. a maximally efficient
> version of memq intended for use in cases where the listiness is
> guaranteed. Functions 2 should not be exported to the Scheme level.
[...]
> I suggest that we introduce function 2 above under the name
>
> scm_c_memq
>
> What do you think?
Assuming that scm_c_memq behaves as scm_memq for the case that the object
can't be found in the list, this is a very good solution. In the long
term (with the new C standard) scm_c_memq should probably become an inline
function.
Dirk Herrmann