[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: binary loadable files
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: binary loadable files |
Date: |
31 Jan 2001 20:12:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Crater Lake) |
Keisuke Nishida <address@hidden> writes:
> At Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:53:49 +0100 (MET),
> Dirk Herrmann wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm, I guess write-object / read-object might be the best in this sense.
> >
> > Well, these don't give any indication of their 'binary' nature. So what
> > about write-object-binary / read-object-binary? A little bit verbose, but
> > tells really all that is needed.
>
> What about `binary-read' and `binary-write'? These might be better
> because they indicate they use a different format than that of
> `read' and `write', while taking the same types of arguments.
also be sure to take a look at `oop/goops/save.scm' in the
distribution.
--
Shit doesn't hurt the world. It provides valuable fertilizer to help
plants grow, grass to help cows, and at least 33% of the content of
off-brand chocolates. --Dave Lynch in rec.music.progressive
Re: binary loadable files, Dale P. Smith, 2001/01/30
Re: binary loadable files, Keisuke Nishida, 2001/01/30