[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Thread support plan with initial patch
|
From: |
Keisuke Nishida |
|
Subject: |
Re: Thread support plan with initial patch |
|
Date: |
Tue, 03 Apr 2001 19:40:05 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.4.0 (Rio) SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) Emacs/21.0.99 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:33:48 +0900 (JST),
NIIBE Yutaka wrote:
>
> > And the initial patch which does (1-1) in the text above.
> >
> > 2001-04-02 NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>
> [...]
>
> BTW, could someone please look this? It's quite conservative,
> I believe it is no harm in current code base.
Is there any objection to this patch? If not, I'll apply it.
I want to see a pthread support in Guile.
(BTW, isn't SCM_THREAD_CRITICAL_SECTION_START too long?
What about just SCM_CRITICAL_SECTION_START?)
Kei
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, (continued)
Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/02
Thread support plan with initial patch, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/02
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch,
Keisuke Nishida <=
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/04/03
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/04/05
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, NIIBE Yutaka, 2001/04/06
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/04/06
- Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Neil Jerram, 2001/04/07
Re: Thread support plan with initial patch, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/04/06