[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"? |
Date: |
25 Apr 2001 23:28:30 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I'd rather we figured a way to make the hygienic macro stuff fast
> > enough...
>
> So it's slow?
I don't think so, actually, but some people apparently seem to
perceive it this way. mostly those who care about loading speed, I
guess (I don't).
--
Paranoid schizophrenics outnumber their enemies at least two to one.
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, (continued)
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Michael Livshin, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Dale P. Smith, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Rob Browning, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?,
Michael Livshin <=
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Nicolas Neuss, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/04/25
- Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Nicolas Neuss, 2001/04/26
Re: Is gentemp or gensym "safe"?, Marius Vollmer, 2001/04/25