Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t

[Rob Browning]

Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:

> currently, by the configure script (it tries `long', `long long' and
> `int.  in general the new C standard has types like int32_t, int64_t
> etc., so maybe we could try them too).
> 
> C is kind of messy.

:>

In general, I suspect that since you'll never know which intN_t is the
right type on a given machine, we may just need to define our own
type(s) and change their definitions whenever appropriate.

-- 
Rob Browning <address@hidden> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930