[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t
From: |
Jacques A. Vidrine |
Subject: |
Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t |
Date: |
Thu, 31 May 2001 23:03:57 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 02:46:06AM +0200, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Thanks! We'll make it so!
>
> I think we should have
>
> typedef uintptr_t scm_t_bits;
> typedef intptr_t scm_t_length;
> typedef uintptr_t scm_t_ulength;
What are these for, exactly (sorry for the dumb question)? If they
are used for storing /pointers/, I'd stick with the standard name --
call a spade a spade. If they are used for something else, I wonder
if u?inptr_t is the right type to use after all.
Cheers,
--
Jacques Vidrine / address@hidden / address@hidden / address@hidden
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t,
Jacques A. Vidrine <=
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/06/01
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/06/01
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Jacques A. Vidrine, 2001/06/01
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/01
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/06/05
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/09
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Marius Vollmer, 2001/06/09
- Re: scm_bits_t / scm_ubits_t, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/06/10