[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer
From: |
Michael Livshin |
Subject: |
Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer |
Date: |
08 Jun 2001 15:30:48 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Copyleft) |
Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:
> Here is a sample line from the preprocessor output when invoked with
> -DSCM_MAGIC_SNARF_DOCS. Note the whitespace between the magic ^ characters.
>
> ^ ^ { ^ ^ fname . "sloppy-assq" ^ ^ type . primitive ^ ^ location "alist.c"
> . 83 ^ ^ arglist . ( SCM key , SCM alist ) ^ ^ argsig 2 0 0 ^ ^ ( "Behaves
> like @code{assq} but does not do any error checking.\n" "Recommended only for
> use in Guile internals." ) ^ ^ }
oh. thanks, I'll look at fixing this.
> Both guile-snarf.in and filter-doc-snarfage.c need to be fixed to cope
> with the extra whitespace. For the former, I have the following
> patch.
>
> [snip]
thanks a lot!
> BTW, is there a reason for guile_filter_doc_snarfage having
> underscores, whereas everything else uses nice dashes?
automake didn't like dashes, so I made them underscores. perhaps
there is some way to convince Automake to like dashes, I don't know.
as a side effect, the underscores provide a hint that the thing is not
to be called by the user. ;)
--
I think we might have been better off with a slide rule.
-- Zaphod Beeblebrox
- Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer,
Michael Livshin <=
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/08
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/20
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/20
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/21
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/21
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Michael Livshin, 2001/06/25
- Re: Another preproc portability problem with the new snarfer, Matthias Koeppe, 2001/06/25