guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Possible typo in doc/Makefile.am


From: Neil Jerram
Subject: Re: Possible typo in doc/Makefile.am
Date: 08 Jun 2001 21:45:43 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7

>>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Koeppe <address@hidden> writes:

    Matthias> When building CVS Guile, I always get gmake[1]: *** No
    Matthias> rule to make target `stamp-vti1', needed by
    Matthias> `version-tutorial.texi'.

    Matthias> Is `stamp-vti1' a typo for `stamp-vti' here?  Only the
    Matthias> latter seems to be built here.

No, it's not a typo.  But it does rely (as does the entry for
version.texi) on carnal knowledge about the file names that Automake
constructs for stamp files, and that could easily have changed in a
recent Automake version.  Are there any other names similar to
`stamp-vti' and `stamp-vti1' in the generated Makefile.in?  (These
file names aren't documented at all in the manual.)  It may be that
there is now a more correct way of doing what these rules are trying
to do.

    Matthias> (I am using CVS automake here because the stable
    Matthias> automake versions don't work well with the compiler I
    Matthias> use.)

Does it work with Automake 2.50?  (I can't tell because I don't have
the new auto tools up and running yet.)

Regards,
        Neil




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]