[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


From: Marius Vollmer
Subject: Re: SCM_CALL_N
Date: 25 Jun 2001 16:33:19 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> Then SCM_CALL_N and SCM_APPLY_N would completely encapsulate the
> optimization use of scm_listofnull, I think.

Yes, I like this, too.

However, should we use macros for this or functions?  Functions would
make it easier to maintain backward compatibility and would stand out
as something special in the code.  But are we concerned about binary
compatibility yet?  Hmm, I don't think so.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]