[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: continuation efficiency
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: continuation efficiency |
Date: |
08 Jul 2001 22:17:47 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.102 |
address@hidden (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes:
> Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > It uses a different algorithm.
>
> The code you posted for call/ec is a wrapper around call/cc.
Yes, sorry for the confusion. I think this issue is clearer now,
right?
[ Just in case: call/ec is more efficient when it is implemented using
catch/throw. It is of course not more efficient when implemented on
top of call/cc. ]
- Re: continuation efficiency, (continued)
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Neil Jerram, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Klaus Schilling, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Martin Grabmueller, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency,
Marius Vollmer <=
- Re: continuation efficiency, Klaus Schilling, 2001/07/09
Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/06
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/07
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Rob Browning, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/08
- Re: continuation efficiency, Marius Vollmer, 2001/07/09
- Re: continuation efficiency, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/07/09
- Re: continuation efficiency, Rob Browning, 2001/07/10
- Re: continuation efficiency, Dale P. Smith, 2001/07/10