Re: Small change in doc snarf output

[Marius Vollmer]

Michael Livshin <address@hidden> writes:

> there's no problem whatsoever to change the snarfer behaviour, of
> course, so if everybody prefers the old way I'll reinstate it.

We should do it the `correct way'.  There is a difference between [foo
bar] and [foo [bar]] and only the author of the function can decided
which one is correct.  So we need a way for the docstring to specify
how the optional arguments should be marked.