[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken GC
|
From: |
Rob Browning |
|
Subject: |
Re: broken GC |
|
Date: |
16 Aug 2001 11:02:33 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
Also I'm wondering if we do decide to move to a precise GC, would that
make it more likely that we could incorporate advancements in GC
algorithms more immediately? Put another way, is it harder, given our
current setup, to do things like switch to a generational GC (or
whatever) than it would be if we were using a precise GC?
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
- broken GC, Tom Lord, 2001/08/05
- Re: broken GC,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: broken GC, Michael Livshin, 2001/08/16
- Re: broken GC, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/08/17
- Re: broken GC, Michael Livshin, 2001/08/17
- Re: broken GC, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/08/19
- Re: broken GC, Michael Livshin, 2001/08/25
- Re: broken GC, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/08/25