[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr
From: |
Dirk Herrmann |
Subject: |
Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Sep 2001 21:37:30 +0200 (MEST) |
On 2 Sep 2001, Martin Baulig wrote:
> So we probably need some scm_str2string() and scm_str2symbol() - and choose
> a better name for them [...]
I agree. However, what speaks against the names scm_str2string and
scm_str2symbol? I like these names since in the line of scm_mem2symbol
they go along nicely with the C library names strcpy and memcpy.
Best regards,
Dirk Herrmann
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Marius Vollmer, 2001/09/01
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Martin Baulig, 2001/09/01
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/09/02
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Martin Baulig, 2001/09/02
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Dave Lambert, 2001/09/03
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr,
Dirk Herrmann <=
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Martin Baulig, 2001/09/04
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Martin Baulig, 2001/09/07
- Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr, Dirk Herrmann, 2001/09/12