Re: scm_* equivalent of gh_scm2newstr

[Martin Baulig]

Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:

> On 2 Sep 2001, Martin Baulig wrote:
> 
> > So we probably need some scm_str2string() and scm_str2symbol() - and choose
> > a better name for them [...]
> 
> I agree.  However, what speaks against the names scm_str2string and
> scm_str2symbol?  I like these names since in the line of scm_mem2symbol
> they go along nicely with the C library names strcpy and memcpy.

Hmm, yes.

-- 
Martin Baulig
address@hidden (private)
address@hidden (work)