Re: Bug in getopt-long?

[Daniel Skarda]

Hello,

   I am sorry I have been silent for so long but I hope that in next week
I will be able (at least) to read through my growing Guile-devel mail box.

   Thank you for for rewriting getopt-long.scm. I tried g.*g.scm from
branch_release-1-6 and I noticed that it does not interpret arguments in the 
same
way as former implementation did (which affects my already written scripts :(

   For example one script used '-I <path>' syntax to specify search path.
Today
    
    ./foo.scm  -I path1 -I path2 foo bar

   stoped working because getopt-long returns only path2 :-(

   I have not yet investigated problem yet (unfortunately because lack of time)
- could you please fix it? 

Thank you,
Dan