[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6 |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Oct 2001 14:41:22 -0700 (PDT) |
On the other hand, achieving such freedom has a large impact on
client programs.
Not necessarily -- in the sense that something close to the existing
API can certainly be implemented on top of the cleaner API, for those
projects where GC robustness and fast call/cc are not important.
My question is about the number and degree to which people are relying
on the current API.
We can't wait until next year.
That's understandable. I'm still interested in how far the current
API has spread.
I definitely agree that this has been a weak point in Guile
development: We should have put more thought into the API from
the start (many times).
Absolutely.
-t
- Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Mikael Djurfeldt, 2001/10/04
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Miroslav Silovic, 2001/10/04
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Richard Guenther, 2001/10/04
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Tom Lord, 2001/10/04
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Neil Jerram, 2001/10/06
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Marius Vollmer, 2001/10/07
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Rob Browning, 2001/10/07
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Neil Jerram, 2001/10/14
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Tom Lord, 2001/10/14
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Marius Vollmer, 2001/10/15
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Steve Tell, 2001/10/23
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Rob Browning, 2001/10/23
- Re: Better support for transition to guile-1.6, Steve Tell, 2001/10/24