Re: memory.text

[Marius Vollmer]

Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:

> On 27 Nov 2001, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> 
> > Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > On 25 Nov 2001, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > What about naming the function scm_make_cell, or scm_new_cell?
> > > > 
> > > > I named it scm_alloc_cell and scm_alloc_double_cell.  Not sure if that
> > > > are better names than yours... 
> > > 
> > > Ah, I hadn't realized that you already had submitted your patches.  Still,
> > > I like the scm_make_cell and scm_make_double_cell names better...  Maybe
> > > we should have a voting :-)
> > 
> > Yeah, why not.
> 
> Then, I believe to have an even better suggestion:  scm_cell and
> scm_double_cell.  Fits nicely with scm_string, scm_vector etc.

Ok.  Do you think the change is still young enough to change it again?
If so, please go ahead. ;)