address@hidden (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)] Re: elisp test case question

[Neil Jerram]

Hi Richard,

I've recently added a prototype Emacs Lisp translator to Guile.  Many
of its names (for modules, functions etc.) use the abbreviation
"elisp".

Thomas Bushnell has suggested there might be important trademark
reasons for _not_ using "elisp", or at least that there were such
reasons in the past.  Can you decide whether those reasons are still
important, and therefore whether I should change "elisp" everywhere to
"emacs-lisp"?

Thanks,
        Neil

> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
>
> Subject: 
>
> Re: elisp test case question
>
>
>
>
> User-agent: 
>
> Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
>
>
>
>
> Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I wonder if the following test case in the elisp test suite is OK:
>
> It's probably no longer *that* important, but there were important
> trademark reasons for not calling Emacs Lisp by the name "elisp" in
> the past, and I think we should continue to avoid it in official
> things.
>
> However, RMS is the real arbiter here.
>
> Thomas
>
> _______________________________________________
> Guile-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
>
>
> --- End Message ---