[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnome-guile broken with guile 1.5 (gg used guile-snarf).
From: |
Neil Jerram |
Subject: |
Re: gnome-guile broken with guile 1.5 (gg used guile-snarf). |
Date: |
14 Mar 2002 20:34:04 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 |
>>>>> "Thien-Thi" == Thien-Thi Nguyen <address@hidden> writes:
Thien-Thi> From: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
Thien-Thi> Date: 08 Mar 2002 12:30:34 +0000
Thien-Thi> It wasn't me that wrote these, but they look useful and I've
no
Thien-Thi> objection to adapting them as you suggest.
Thien-Thi> sorry for the mis-attribution. i believe Greg Badros wrote
those docs.
Thien-Thi> what are your plans for them, btw? as soon as i check in the
updated
Thien-Thi> tools.texi, i'd like to remove sources/snarf.texi to reduce
confusion.
In my view, it's fine to remove anything in `sources' as soon as we
are sure that it is no longer useful. And I'd say that having
equivalent/updated material elsewhere would make the `sources' copy
unuseful.
Neil
- gnome-guile broken with guile 1.5 (gg used guile-snarf)., Rob Browning, 2002/03/06
- Re: gnome-guile broken with guile 1.5 (gg used guile-snarf)., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/08
- Re: gnome-guile broken with guile 1.5 (gg used guile-snarf)., Rob Browning, 2002/03/11
- Re: gnome-guile broken with guile 1.5 (gg used guile-snarf)., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/12
- Re: gnome-guile broken with guile 1.5 (gg used guile-snarf)., Rob Browning, 2002/03/12
- Re: gnome-guile broken with guile 1.5 (gg used guile-snarf)., Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2002/03/12
- Re: gnome-guile broken with guile 1.5 (gg used guile-snarf)., Rob Browning, 2002/03/12