[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gen gc
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: gen gc |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:21:36 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
> > What if I can't? Memory cells are going to move around. I don't see a
> > way to generate a unique number without making some kind of table for
> > objects subjected to object-address.
> >
> > Btw, I can imagine that internal hash tables might use the address of
> > a cell as a source for a hash index. Does that happen anywhere?
>
> Look into hash.[ch]. scm_hashq seems to be what you think of.
OK. In that case, how is this handled? Can we simply disallow plain
cells as hash keys? Oh wait scm_hasher doesn't use the adress of an
object. Good.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen/
- Re: gen gc, (continued)
- Re: gen gc, Rob Browning, 2002/07/18
- Re: gen gc, Han-Wen, 2002/07/19
- Re: gen gc, Rob Browning, 2002/07/19
- Re: gen gc, Tom Lord, 2002/07/19
- Re: gen gc, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/07/19
- Re: gen gc, Rob Browning, 2002/07/19
- Re: gen gc, Han-Wen, 2002/07/19
- Re: gen gc, Rob Browning, 2002/07/19
- Re: gen gc, Marius Vollmer, 2002/07/19
- Re: gen gc, Dirk Herrmann, 2002/07/18
- Re: gen gc,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: gen gc, Marius Vollmer, 2002/07/19
- Re: gen gc, Neil Jerram, 2002/07/20