Re: Getting no messages

[Rob Browning]

Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:

> Personally I find parallel-branch development (which I do for
> applicable doc fixes and enhancements) to be an additional burden that
> I would prefer not to have.  I think it's easier all round if we
> restrict 1.6.x to bug fixes (broadly speaking), only put new stuff
> into 1.7.x, and look forward to 1.8 sooner rather than later.

I totally agree about getting 1.8 out ASAP, but I consider these fixes
bug-fixes:

  - srfi headers were ommitted in 1.6.0.

  - emacs stuff was broken.

  - ltdl was broken.

I'd be perfectly happy if the only 1.6.X releases after 1.6.1 are doc
updates, and debian/* commits.  I may even leave the debian/* out and
save that for 1.8...

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C  64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD