[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Recursive mutexes?
|
From: |
Rob Browning |
|
Subject: |
Re: Recursive mutexes? |
|
Date: |
Sat, 26 Oct 2002 17:29:29 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) |
Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:
> One thing that the POSIX model has going for it is exposure -- I
> suspect a lot of people are familiar with how the API works, so my
> default inclination would be to follow that API whenever there's not a
> good reason not to.
Oh, and I probably should have mentioned, I mean most likely we deal
with a *subset* of the posix API since I don't know that we want to
accomodate everything like the thread cancellation stuff, etc...
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD
Re: Recursive mutexes?, Rob Browning, 2002/10/26
- Re: Recursive mutexes?,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: Recursive mutexes?, Tom Lord, 2002/10/26
- Re: Recursive mutexes?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/26
- Re: Recursive mutexes?, Tom Lord, 2002/10/26
- Re: Recursive mutexes?, Tom Lord, 2002/10/26
- Re: Recursive mutexes?, Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2002/10/26
Re: Recursive mutexes?, Tom Lord, 2002/10/26
Re: Recursive mutexes?, Marius Vollmer, 2002/10/26