[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: memoization and conditional defines

From: Clinton Ebadi
Subject: Re: memoization and conditional defines
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 15:54:19 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.4.2

> I don't care how memoization works.  I understand there are
> optimization issues.  Optimizing isn't important to me, or
> I would not use an interpretive language as my "extension
> language".  If you add a disabling mechanism, then you'll
> have the best of all worlds.  You can memoize/optimize to
> your heart's content, and I'll disable it for my purposes.
> If that is not practical and Guile becomes, essentially,
> an semi-compiled language with constraints on where
> defines may happen, then my goose will be cooked.

Not to mention how Guile wouldn't be Scheme anymore. Why can't code be 
memiozied and compiled incrementally?

Truth lies in loneliness
When hope is long gone by

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]