[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Cygwin patch for 1.6.4
From: |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen |
Subject: |
Re: Cygwin patch for 1.6.4 |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Oct 2003 09:21:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Rob Browning writes:
> OK, so just to make sure I follow, this is a patch against 1.6.4,
Yes,
> it would be appropriate for the upcoming 1.6.5.
Yes,
> Further, if I'm going ot apply it to 1.6 before 1.6.5, I should
> ignore the libool bits.
> Did I get that right?
Maybe, but I'm not sure what happens when you 'ignore the libtool
bits'. What I meant to say whas that I'd like to have the libtool
part of the patch in too, but that it makes the patch against 1.6.4
deceptively large. That's because I updated to libtool CVS.
The new guile diffs against libtool, generated automagically in
libguile-ltdl/upstream, are more readable, because they are very
small.
The fact that guile 1.6.x is no longer a standard libtoolized package
(where the user can upgrade libtool with a single command if
necessary) but ships a modified copy that needs some work to upgrade
is what cost me most time. But maybe I missed something.
Sorry for the confusion.
Greetings,
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org
Re: Cygwin patch for 1.6.4, Kevin Ryde, 2003/10/01