Re: records as s-expressions

[Paul Jarc]

Marius Vollmer <address@hidden> wrote:
> Something like this:
>
>   (define r (make-record-type foo '(a b) readable-record-printer))
>   (register-record-reader 'foo foo)

Is there any reaon that make-record-type should not automatically
register the type name for reading as well as printing?


paul