[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: srfi-26

From: Greg Troxel
Subject: Re: srfi-26
Date: 16 Jan 2004 13:53:55 -0500
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3

  From: address@hidden (Paul Jarc)

  The FSF wants legal documentation so they can prove that it is in the
  public domain - just in case the author has second thoughts later, I

Or if the author's employer claims that something was a work for
hire.  That's the point of the employer-disclaimer, which is separate
conceptutally from the copyright assignment.  So for PD code this
still applies; it's arguably only really PD if the person who said so
was the copyright owner, so a signed statement from the author that
it's PD and from employer (anyone who might have a work-for-hire
claim) disclaiming copyright interest should do, at least

IANAL, TINLA, blah blah blah.

        Greg Troxel <address@hidden>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]