[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode)
From: |
Marius Vollmer |
Subject: |
Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode) |
Date: |
Mon, 17 May 2004 23:14:19 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
address@hidden (Paul Jarc) writes:
> Dirk Herrmann <address@hidden> wrote:
>> The names scm_is_true and scm_is_false don't fit into the schema,
>> since true and false are no types.
>
> We might think of these scm_is_* functions more generally as
> predicates, some of which happen to be type predicates.
Right; that's what I had in mind. I also propose scm_is_eq, for
example.
--
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405
- Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode), (continued)
- Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode), Dirk Herrmann, 2004/05/15
- Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode), Marius Vollmer, 2004/05/17
- Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode), Marius Vollmer, 2004/05/17
- Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode), Marius Vollmer, 2004/05/17
- Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode), Marius Vollmer, 2004/05/17
- Re: GH replacement proposal (includes a bit of Unicode),
Marius Vollmer <=