[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Critical section review
|
From: |
Mikael Djurfeldt |
|
Subject: |
Re: Critical section review |
|
Date: |
Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:35:06 +0100 |
On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:19:22 +0000, Neil Jerram <address@hidden> wrote:
> So this is now just:
> SCM_RETURN_NEWSMOB (scm_tc16_memoized, scm_cons (exp, env));
>
> which is a completely mechanical change except that one SCM_UNPACK(...)
> has become ((scm_t_bits) ...) - is the definition of SCM_NEWSMOB correct
> in using (scm_t_bits) rather than SCM_UNPACK ?
Well,I guess so. I'm no SCM_PACK/SCM_UNPACK expert.
M