Re: SRFI 61: a more general `cond' clause

[Kevin Ryde]

Stephen Compall <address@hidden> writes:
>
> I also have a pure syntax-rules

That stuff was very slow last time I tried it.  define-macro would be
better if you go the macro route.

> +SRFI 61 is implemented in the Guile core; there's no need to
> +use this module at the moment.  However, it may be moved into this
> +module, and the module @code{(srfi srfi-61)} is available, so it
> +wouldn't hurt to use it.

I think you should decide now if applications need to use that module
or not.  If not then may as well describe the full syntax with the
main `cond' docs.

> +;;; srfi-6.scm --- Basic String Ports

Too much cut and paste :-)