Re: scm_leave_guile, setjmp, and caller-saved registers

[Ken Raeburn]

On Dec 6, 2005, at 14:10, Marius Vollmer wrote:
> Ken Raeburn <address@hidden> writes:
> > Somebody please check me on this, I'm not sure if scm_leave_guile can
> > be relied upon to work.
>
> I believe everything you say is correct, unfortunately.

Sorry. :-)
I was hoping maybe I was missing something...

> I will make the change you propose to scm_without_guile and remove
> scm_leave_guile and scm_enter_guile.  I will put your explanation next
> to scm_without_guile.

Thanks.

Ken