[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3 |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:55:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Neil Jerram <address@hidden> writes:
> For `current-reader' I think we should stick as we are.
Then, should we go ahead and remove the `current-module' and
`set-current-module' procedures in favor of `current-module' as a fluid?
By not exporting the fluid directly, my original patch kept away from
such a highly controversial debate. ;-)
The "principle of least surprise" _is_ important for people coming to
the language/implementation.
Thanks,
Ludovic.
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/12/05
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Marius Vollmer, 2005/12/06
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/13
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/12/14
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/14
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Ludovic Courtès, 2005/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/15
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Tomas Zerolo, 2005/12/16
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/17
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Marius Vollmer, 2005/12/17
- Re: [PATCH] Per-module reader, take #3, Neil Jerram, 2005/12/29