[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: procedure-name on procedure with setter

From: Neil Jerram
Subject: Re: procedure-name on procedure with setter
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:05:16 +0000
User-agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)

Kevin Ryde <address@hidden> writes:

> I wrote:
>> This would be for 1.6 too.  Perhaps other non-closures should be
>> recognised by scm_m_define too.  Would everything passing
>> scm_procedure_p be ok?
> I made an executive decision to use scm_procedure_p, but I left 1.6
> alone.

That sounds good to me.  Am I right in thinking that the main
practical impact of this is in backtraces?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]