[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: srfi-18 and the vm
From: |
Julian Graham |
Subject: |
Re: srfi-18 and the vm |
Date: |
Fri, 22 May 2009 11:01:36 -0400 |
I second the Yaaaay!
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 10:39 AM, Andy Wingo <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm catching up with mail. On my syncase-in-boot-9 branch, I enabled
> compilation of srfi-18 and fixed a bug in it regarding multiple-value
> returns. Now I just ran the srfi-18 test like 100 times in a row and it
> didn't show any strange errors. Yaaaay!
>
> With psyntax running a pre-analysis phase on all source code, we can do
> away with lazy memoization entirely -- a neat hack, but it made eval.c
> buggy and impenetrable. I'll write more about that in the future.
- srfi-18 and the vm, Andy Wingo, 2009/05/22
- Re: srfi-18 and the vm,
Julian Graham <=
- Re: srfi-18 and the vm, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/05/22
- Re: srfi-18 and the vm, Neil Jerram, 2009/05/23
- Re: srfi-18 and the vm, Andy Wingo, 2009/05/23
- Re: srfi-18 and the vm, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/05/23
- Re: srfi-18 and the vm, Andy Wingo, 2009/05/23
- Re: srfi-18 and the vm, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/05/24
- Re: srfi-18 and the vm, Neil Jerram, 2009/05/25
- Re: srfi-18 and the vm, Andy Wingo, 2009/05/29