[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (language tree-il compile-glil) question
From: |
Jon Herron |
Subject: |
Re: (language tree-il compile-glil) question |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:09:59 -0700 (PDT) |
Cool, thanks for the push. I'll get by on return until the time comes to
switch over to the other method that you mentioned.
Thanks,
Jon
----- Original Message ----
From: Andy Wingo <address@hidden>
To: Jon Herron <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Sent: Tue, April 27, 2010 5:06:39 PM
Subject: Re: (language tree-il compile-glil) question
On Tue 27 Apr 2010 07:40, Jon Herron <address@hidden> writes:
> In some late night hacking this evening/morn I came across a question
> in (language tree-il compile-glil) - should line 126 read ((return . 1)
> . return) instead of ((return . 1) return)?
Indeed, it appears that way. I have fixed and pushed, thanks for the
note!
Return is a hack, though; I would rather express returns using prompt
and abort, with some tree-il inliner logic to simplify some cases. But I
was in a rush, so return is how it is.
I'll be updating tree-il and vm docs to correspond to reality this
weekend.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/