[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fmatch
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: fmatch |
Date: |
Sat, 22 May 2010 23:03:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hi!
stefan <address@hidden> writes:
> Shall we say that we use the slightly modified version of (ice-9 match) that
> ypu dug up for now!
Hmm, yes? Please send an actual patch against Guile master, so we have
something concrete do discuss. :-)
Can you make sure to isolate Guile-specific changes, ideally in a way
that allows us to include upstream files (match.scm itself and test
cases) unmodified? See the sxml and lalr modules for examples.
> On a side note I have not gotten any answer from the author of that code
> that I modified.
Hmm that’s unfortunate.
If we can’t get record-matching included upstream shortly, then I’d
suggest making the addition of record-matching a separate commit in our
repository, so we can easily find it in the future.
Could you do that?
Thanks!
Ludo’.
- fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/06
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/07
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/07
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/07
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/07
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/09
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/09
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/10
- Re: fmatch, Stefan, 2010/05/11
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/17
- Re: fmatch,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/22
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/23
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/23
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/24
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/24
- Re: fmatch, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/25
- Re: fmatch, stefan, 2010/05/25