[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: r6rs incompatibilities
From: |
Mike Gran |
Subject: |
Re: r6rs incompatibilities |
Date: |
Sun, 23 May 2010 09:02:00 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Julian Graham address@hidden
> One thing I noticed while look at Andreas' `wak' project is that the
> use of `#!r6rs' seems to be pretty common, which conflicts with
> Guile's support for SCSH-style block comments. Find attached a
> (somewhat inelegant) patch that adds support for the `#!r6rs' lexeme
> in the default reader. (What do people think about this? Is there a
> better way to do it?)
What happens with this patch if the file only contains the four
characters "#!r6" followed by EOF? Does it behave appropriately
after calling scm_ungetc on EOF? (I guess that would make it an
unterminated hash bang comment.)
Thanks,
Mike
- r6rs incompatibilities, Andy Wingo, 2010/05/21
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Julian Graham, 2010/05/21
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Julian Graham, 2010/05/23
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities,
Mike Gran <=
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Julian Graham, 2010/05/23
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Andy Wingo, 2010/05/23
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Andy Wingo, 2010/05/23
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Julian Graham, 2010/05/26
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Andy Wingo, 2010/05/26
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Ludovic Courtès, 2010/05/26
- Re: r6rs incompatibilities, Andy Wingo, 2010/05/27