[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
two spaces after sentence + other doc janitorial duties
From: |
Thien-Thi Nguyen |
Subject: |
two spaces after sentence + other doc janitorial duties |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:35:18 +0200 |
Normally, texinfo source should have two spaces after each sentence:
Blah the first. Blah more. ;; only one space, not cool
Blah the first. Blah more. ;; two spaces, ok
I started locally modifying doc/ref/*.texi, when midway though discovered
api-undocumented.texi, which led me to doc/maint/docstring.el, which leads
me to believe that modifing doc/ref/*.texi is not so smart, since a future
update using docstring.el would overwrite them. Better to make the changes
upstream (in libguile/*.c SCM_DEFINE forms, to be precise), no?
Further digging, i see one of the last docstring.el-using updates was:
commit 3323ec063ccc87b210e6da04c57c625af270b230
Author: Neil Jerram <address@hidden>
Date: Sun Dec 27 23:24:09 2009 +0000
Automatic manual updates following libguile docstring changes
and since then there have been many other manual updates. So, should i
interpret the six months since that update to mean that we are no longer
using a docstring.el-based system? Am i missing something?
I suppose a shorter question would be: What do you all suggest for doing
"two spaces" and other doc cleanups -- which source is the true source?
Other changes i have in mind:
- convert "..." to "@dots{}";
- convert "i.e. FOO" to "i.e., FOO"
(and likewise "i. e. FOO" and "e.g. FOO");
- choose "Returns" or "Return" and use it everywhere;
Last related question: I realize that a subset of the doc/ref/*.texi do
not derive from docstring.el (for example vm.texi), so can be operated
on directly w/o qualms. How about i collect changes to those files onto
branch ‘ttn/janitor-doc’ and simply post "rfc: SHA1"? I can't imagine
huge diffs would be welcome on the list...
thi
- two spaces after sentence + other doc janitorial duties,
Thien-Thi Nguyen <=