guile-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cross building 1.9.14 for mingw


From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Subject: Re: cross building 1.9.14 for mingw
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:16:24 +0100

Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 29-01-2011 om 22:34 [+0100]:

Hi Ludovic,

> OK but all the modules listed after ‘accept’ above are needed too,
> right?

Yes, sure.

> Hmm could it be that there was a typo?  Here running ‘git-version-gen’
> outside of a Git tree works fine:
> 
>   $ guile/build-aux/git-version-gen .tarball-version s/foo/bar/
>   UNKNOWN

Yes, does it also work when you change configure.ac and autoreconf?

> Ouch.  May I suggest reporting it to address@hidden  :-)  I think
> people there would be happy to provide an appropriate fix and we
> wouldn’t even have to worry.  ;-)

Yes, hat would be nice.

> > --- a/libguile/bdw-gc.h
> > +++ b/libguile/bdw-gc.h
> > @@ -30,7 +30,9 @@
> >     allocation.  */
> >  
> >  # define GC_THREADS 1
> > +#ifndef __MINGW32__
> >  # define GC_REDIRECT_TO_LOCAL 1
> > +#endif /* __MINGW32__ */
> 
> Why?

I'm using gc-6.8 and cannot seem to build a version for Mingw that
includes GC_local_malloc -- that seems to be for linux pthreads only.

Removing this redirect to local, fixes these

    .libs/libguile_2.0_la-alist.o:alist.c:(.text+0x6bf): undefined reference to 
`_GC_local_malloc'

build errors.

> > -      buf->st_mode = _S_IFSOCK | _S_IREAD | _S_IWRITE | _S_IEXEC;
> > +      buf->st_mode = _S_IREAD | _S_IWRITE | _S_IEXEC;
> 
> Why?  Isn’t ‘_S_IFSOCK’ defined on all MinGW?

I don't have in it my mingw-runtime-3.14.  If there's a newer version,
I've misses something and would like to hear it.

> > +#ifndef __MINGW32__
> >  /* Make sure the `AI_*' flags can be stored as INUMs.  */
> >  verify (SCM_I_INUM (SCM_I_MAKINUM (AI_ALL)) == AI_ALL);
> 
> Does MinGW lack getaddrinfo?

No, it lacks the AI_* definitions.  I realise that you may not want
to include this just yet, although it "documents" my progress building
it for mingw.

> Gnulib’s ‘getaddrinfo’ module, which we use, is supposed to take care of
> this, i.e., it should fall back to ‘gethostbyname’ if needed.

Yes.

More bits in a new thread.

Thanks, greetings,
Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar®  http://AvatarAcademy.nl  




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]